Paradox Security Systems
Rhizome | SECURITY AESTHETIC = SYSTEMS PANIC
This essay originated from the anthology DATA browser 04: Creating Insecurity: art and culture in the age of security edited by Wolfgang Sützl and Geoff Cox. The book was published by Autonomedia this year and is licensed under Creative Commons .
Where does security end, and insecurity begin? Systems analysts recognise this as a classic boundary question. Its answer determines the precise deployment of any security system. But as we shall see, this particular boundary question cannot be answered under present conditions, except through the definition of a second system, a specifically interrogatory one. Drawing on the work of an American art critic of the 1960s, I’ll call this second kind of bounded entity an ‘aesthetic system’.
First we should consider how security systems are installed in reality. Attention is focused on every point where an environment, conceived as ‘secure’, comes into contact with its outer edges. Typically, these edges are doors, windows, property lines, borders, coasts, air-space – every place of ingress or egress. At each of the edges, a catalogue of known and present dangers is established. An analysis is conducted to determine the most effective responses to these dangers; and then locks, barriers, fences, warning devices, surveillance personnel, armed guards, etc. are positioned at the system’s boundaries to repel the threat. Further efforts are expended to look into the crystal ball of the future, predicting all those points where new threats could call for the definition of new boundaries. More material and personnel can now be deployed, or at least, readied for deployment. The security system expands dynamically, continually adjusting its relations to the outside world, continually redefining its own boundaries as a system.
One can easily imagine how a home, an airport or a harbour can be made ‘secure’. An initial, safe or ‘quiet’ inside space must simply be preserved from outer harm. But what happens in a complex social system, one composed of many different actors, some with irreconcilably diverging interests? What happens when the space to be protected is as much linguistic and ideological as it is physical and architectural, so that a breach of legitimacy or a leak of information can be perceived as illicit ingress or egress? In short, what happens in a contested environment where threats can arise from within? The response is clear: what happens is vertiginous paranoia.
...PARADOX SECURITY SYSTEMS, LTD. v. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
PARADOX SECURITY SYSTEMS, LTD. v. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
PARADOX SECURITY SYSTEMS, LTD., SHMUEL HERSHKOVITZ, AND PINHAS SHPATER, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. AND DIGITAL SECURITY CONTROLS, LTD., Defendants-Appellees, AND
MONITRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant, AND
PROTECTION ONE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 2010-1012.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Decided: July 19, 2010
JOSEPH J. MUELLER, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were MICHAEL A. DIENER, MEGAN BECK BARBERO and CHRISTOPHER M. STRAW.
J. MICHAEL JAKES, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees ADT Security Services, Inc., et al. With him on the brief was EDWARD J. NAIDICH.
MAX CICCARELLI, Thompson & Knight LLP, of Dallas, Texas, argued for defendant-appellee Protection One, Inc. With him on the brief were JANE POLITZ BRANDT and J. MICHAEL HEINLEN.
Paradox Marine, Marine Magellan wireless security system
Demonstration of Paradox Marine's Marine Magellan wireless security and monitoring system. Atlantic Marine Electrical Services is a proud ...
Paradox Security Systems- News
Obama cancels missile defence and changes transatlantic politics
|
|
Neuroscience Expert to Lecture on Balance Between National ... PITTSBURGH-Recent advancements in neuroscience have paved the way for innovative tools widely used within the United State's national security system. |
|
Researchers overwhelming vendors with security flaws This paradox is one of a number of findings contained in the Top Cyber Security Risks report, which the organisation now plans to publish twice yearly in and more » |
|
" LA County Puts 'Technology' Before 'Democracy' " " LA County Puts 'Technology' Before 'Democracy' "Speaking at the closing remarks, LA County's Election Tally Systems Manager Ken Bennett, the man charged with overseeing much of the county's election Democracy's Gold Standard:all 2 news articles » |
Iran Proposes Control System Aimed at Eliminating Nuclear Weapons
|